<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging: A Defense Against Bad Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biziki.com/biz/blogging-a-defense-against-bad-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biziki.com/biz/blogging-a-defense-against-bad-press/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:54:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.biziki.com/biz/blogging-a-defense-against-bad-press/comment-page-1/#comment-18217</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biziki.com/biz/blogging-a-defense-against-bad-press/#comment-18217</guid>
		<description>Interesting thought - a bit pessimistic, though, isn&#039;t it?  However, I do see your point and if bloggers throw away their sensibilities and idealism, then the picture you&#039;ve painted is not far off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought &#8211; a bit pessimistic, though, isn&#8217;t it?  However, I do see your point and if bloggers throw away their sensibilities and idealism, then the picture you&#8217;ve painted is not far off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark L. Gamis</title>
		<link>http://www.biziki.com/biz/blogging-a-defense-against-bad-press/comment-page-1/#comment-17819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark L. Gamis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biziki.com/biz/blogging-a-defense-against-bad-press/#comment-17819</guid>
		<description>While I agree with the argument that blogging provides a way to fight bad press, here&#039;s the real question that I&#039;d like to propose: With the blurring line between traditional media and this new generation of writers/bloggers, how do we make sure that the new breeds (bloggers), or rather the collective new media (old and new) don&#039;t fall to the same trap that put the darker side of traditional media to where it is now? Yellow journalisim, over-sensationalism, bias, and other issues - will the &quot;wisdom of the crowd&quot; survive these? Or are we seeing one bad apple being replaced by another one that is just as bad, or maybe even worse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with the argument that blogging provides a way to fight bad press, here&#8217;s the real question that I&#8217;d like to propose: With the blurring line between traditional media and this new generation of writers/bloggers, how do we make sure that the new breeds (bloggers), or rather the collective new media (old and new) don&#8217;t fall to the same trap that put the darker side of traditional media to where it is now? Yellow journalisim, over-sensationalism, bias, and other issues &#8211; will the &#8220;wisdom of the crowd&#8221; survive these? Or are we seeing one bad apple being replaced by another one that is just as bad, or maybe even worse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

